Posted by admin - April 4th, 2012
Nimue has been a bit too cheeky and bouncy whilst master tried to watch tv. It seems even ropes and bondage doesnt stop the submissive brat. So he decides to restrain her silly jumping about with a creative hogtie and leave her to ponder the situation on the guest sofa. Nimue is hogtied with hemp rope works tying her arms behind her back and connecting to her raised and immobile legs.

For a while it seemed the trick worked. The submissive finally settled down in her ropes and stopped harassing masters tv habits. However, with this bratty slave girl peace rarely lasts long and song she started jabbering away from her tied up and helpless position. Are you simply begging for a gag? The master asked … and the brat replied: Oh yes please master, make me gag!

Nimue is securely hogtied but whilst the english submissive is put in strict amateur bondage on the sofa, she still manages to be a brat. What happens next? Will she be gagged, will she be whipped or taken to the dungeon … or simply left on the sofa? You can follow all the events in Nimues life as a slave girl on her private site Nimues World – Amateur Bondage and Spanking
Posted in Uncategorized - No Comments »
Tags: amateur bondage, creative hogtie, hogtied, submissive brat, tied up and helpless
Posted by admin - March 12th, 2012
Playing with Ice – suggested usage by Magick from Shadow Slaves
Adding ice to buckets of water then dunking a girl suspecded upside down head first into it is fun
Making someone try to stand still on a large block is fun too, but best to give them a rope support in case they slip.
Kneeling on cracked ice…
Putting ice in a girls knickers while in a bar, so that as it melts it makes her look like she’s wetting herself?
Posted in Uncategorized - No Comments »
Posted by admin - September 18th, 2011
Keeping A Subs Tear In A Jar?
Cool or Fool ?
Magick: It’s kinda a cool idea in theory, but tears aren’t saline – they contain protein-based hormones, mucus , glucose and urea – so unfortunately they’d go ‘off’ in a rather nasty manner fairly quickly, and you’ll be left with quite a nasty stinky mess. Though they would probably form a fairly interesting base for a mould garden.
Posted in Uncategorized - No Comments »
Tags: tears in a jar
Posted by admin - September 17th, 2010
What Wikiopedia has to say:
History
In 2005, the British government consulted on criminalising the possession of such images, following a campaign led by Jane Longhurst’s mother and sister. A 50,000 signature petition was submitted to the government demanding a ban of “extreme internet sites promoting violence against women in the name of sexual gratification”. On 30 August 2006, the government published the results of the consultation and announced its intention to introduce a possession ban on all extreme pornography as soon as the legislative timetable allows. Opinions on the proposals were sharply divided in the consultation, with 63% of responses rejecting the need for regulation of Extreme Pornography on the Internet. The proposed maximum penalty for possession is three years imprisonment.
Arguments
A number of key issues need to be addressed particularly with regard to precise definition of what is to become unlawful. It is clear that Extreme Pornography includes not only images where extreme violence is taking place, but also images where people are simply role playing such violence. Material is considered Extreme Pornography only if the main purpose of creating it was produce sexual arousal. This rules out most mainstream films, documentaries, war footage or instructional videos, regardless of content. Textual material or cartoon depictions are also excluded regardless of theme or detail.
The main purpose of criminalising possession seems to be the claim that it would reduce the likelihood of people copying the behaviour depicted. The consultation acknowledged that there was no research evidence that this effect would be achieved. Instead, the consultation suggested a causal link between exposure to such material and behavior, based on evidence at the murder trial of the man who killed Jane Longhurst (see section 10 of the consultation document). Although practising erotic asphyxia for five years before exposure to such material, the exposure was claimed to be the cause. In spite of anecdotal evidence suggesting that viewing Extreme Pornography is commonplace among those engaging in extreme sexual practices, the presence of Extreme Pornography was still claimed to be a highly significant factor in triggering the man to commit what otherwise would be a motiveless murder.
Another of the claimed benefits of the ban is that it will help protect people forced against their will to perform illegal acts in the creation of such material. In particular, it will help protect women from gang rape, mutilation or bestiality by reducing the potential to profit from making such content. The consultation document did not attempt to estimate the magnitude of this problem, citing no evidence whatsoever that such content is being distributed at all. Furthermore, the law would cover images whether or not the participants consented, and whether or not actual violence was involved.
Proponents of the ban state that criminalising possession will reduce the risk of accidental exposure to such material, particularly by children. No evidence of accidental exposure or its impact was cited in the consultation. Given the relative rarity of the material in question, it is likely that the vast majority of accidental exposure to serious violence and pornography will be to forms other than Extreme Pornography.
No cost-benefit analysis has been attempted by the government to support a ban on possession of Extreme Pornographic images. The cost has been estimated to be minimal, based on the unsubstantiated claim that such material is exceptionally rare. If the prevalance of the material is comparable to that of child pornography, the cost may turn out to be comparable too, casting doubt on the government’s de minimis costing. The benefit can only be estimated once the relationship between exposure to the material and criminal behaviour has been determined. In addition, the reduction in trafficking of victims into the production of commercial non-consensual extreme pornography as a result of criminalising possession of all extreme pornography is unknown.
Posted in Uncategorized - No Comments »
Posted by admin - September 17th, 2008
A new law puts a ban on producing, publishing & posessing BDSM/extreme material in the UK.Sadly it does apply to annyone in the UK producing, publishing or even just posessing “violent sexual” material. There will be testcases of course to determine where the line is – but reading the law, its much more than just “consent”, as acts that lookFor instance from the law:
“By actual scenes or depictions which appear to be real acts, we intend to catch material which either is genuinely violent or conveys a realistic impression of fear, violence and harm.“So, if it just looks like violence, consensual or not, its forbidden. This will be devastating to Sadomasochistic people & related niches surely…and the penalties are severe: 3years in prison for possession, 5years for producing.
I suppose it´d be wise for me to stop shooting in the UK
Posted in Uncategorized - No Comments »
Tags: british bdsm, extreme porn law
Posted by admin - March 11th, 2007
Posted in Uncategorized - No Comments »
Posted by admin - March 9th, 2007
Hmmm. No good news to report really about the law in the UK putting a ban on possesion & publishing of extreme/BDSM material – the people at spannertrust.org and other organisations are still fighting it – but it seems doubtfull if they will be successfull. I cant believe the level of censorship this introduces…
Posted in Uncategorized - No Comments »
Posted by admin - March 3rd, 2007
Working on the pussy of the dutch slavegirl with the tens unit, for some good hard electro torture. I still prefer the violet wand, but noone should live without a tens unit either

Posted in Uncategorized - No Comments »
Posted by admin - February 18th, 2007
The extreme porn law still seems to be happening – allthough it would appear there has been massive protests from all sorts of groups. And it is quite fundamentally an attack on certain sexualities – and of course the freedom of speech and expression. I cant believe britain is walking this way.
Tony and his tossers really should stop for a moment and think about the level of censorship they are introducing – without any noticable positive side effects whatsoever.
You can read more here:
Posted in Uncategorized - No Comments »
Posted by admin - February 12th, 2007
Hmmm…even on a slow day, there´s room for a new girl. My good friend Max met her and she´s quite into the BDSM thing. Have only shot a bit of test thing with her so far, but hopefully there´ll be more – she´s a sweetie.

Posted in Uncategorized - No Comments »